10 Essential Scope Review Items Every Architect Should Align with Contractors
- jaehorbacz
- Aug 7
- 2 min read

In the world of architecture and construction, a well-defined scope of work (SOW) is the foundation of a successful project. By meticulously reviewing the SOW, architects and contractors guarantee clarity, efficiency, and quality from the start. Adhering to a structured process ensures both parties have a clear understanding of their responsibilities, expectations, and deliverables.
Essential Components to Review
Project Overview and Description
Define the project type, scale, and purpose (e.g., new construction, renovation-helps to set the stage for a sucessful project by ensuring everyone is on the same page from the start).
Clearly specify locations, affected areas, and key objectives.
Detailed List of Architect’s Services
Outline all services to be provided (e.g., schematic design, design development, construction documents, permitting assistance, and site visits).
Specify the covered disciplines (e.g., architectural, structural, MEP, landscape).
Indicate any exclusions or optional/extra services that would require additional fees.
Drawings and Documentation
List expected deliverables, including drawings, specifications, and technical documents for bidding and construction phases.
Reference the quality standards and applicable codes.
Project Schedule and Milestones
Set project timelines, key milestones, and deadlines for each phase.
Highlight review and approval periods for major submissions.
Project Coordination and Communication Protocols
Define channels for communication, frequency of meetings, and reporting protocols.
Specify requirements for shop drawing, submittals, and product data reviews.
Change Management Procedures
Outline the process for handling changes, issuing addenda, and evaluating change orders.
Quality Control and Site Visit Responsibilities
Detail the frequency of site visits and their purpose (quality assurance, progress verification, field reporting).
Note procedures for identifying, reporting, and rectifying non-conforming work.
Roles and Authorities
Clarify decision-making authority for approvals, changes, and dispute resolution.
Assign responsibility for coordination with consultants, permits, and regulatory approvals.
Payment Terms and Cost Controls
Clearly state fees, payment schedules, and procedures for billing.
Establish methods for tracking progress in relation to payments and deliverables.
Final Inspections and Project Closeout
Provide specific requirements for punch list completion, warranties, post-construction site reviews, and handoff documentation.
Key Scope of Work Review Items
Category | Key Content Areas |
Project Description | Type, location, objectives |
Services Provided | Design phases, coordination, optional/excluded services |
Documentation & Deliverables | Drawings, specifications, technical documents |
Schedule & Milestones | Timelines, major deliverables, reviews |
Communication | Meeting cadence, channels, submittal review process |
Change Management | Addenda, change order procedures |
Quality Assurance | Site visits, field reports, deficiency identification |
Roles & Authorities | Approvals, coordination, regulatory compliance |
Payment Terms | Fees, billing schedule, cost control |
Closeout | Punch lists, final acceptance, warranties |
In a nut shell:
Practical Tips for Reviewing SOW
Always compare the SOW against the contract and proposal documents to spot discrepancies.
Check for vague or generic language; all responsibilities and deliverables should be specific and measurable.
Review for alignment with your team's capacity and expertise; negotiate exclusions as needed before signing.
Verify that timelines are realistic and that dependencies (like client reviews/approvals) are clearly scheduled.
Clarify any cost recovery or payment triggers—unclear terms here can delay payments.
A robust SOW is the backbone of any construction or design contract: It instills client confidence, safeguards your interests, and significantly minimizes the risk of disputes by clearly defining roles and the contractual framework.




Comments